Rob, I hope this answers your question.
The Democrat bosses still have a chance to right this wrong and apply the rule fairly. Either all must following the 1974 rule or none do. If Todd isn't reinstated as the Democratic Party nominee, I will not vote for a single Democrat in November, including you and you. (C'mon, Little Jim, it's 2006. Get a Web site, for chrissakes.)
UPDATE: Turnham, the state Democratic leader, seems to understand the impact this reversal could have on his party's legitimacy. He is rallying the troops to overturn the subcommittee's decision.
I am disappointed that the sub-committee took a narrow, impractical view of the obsolete bylaw in question, applying it equally to each candidate. This section of our bylaws is archaic and has not been required by the party since 1988. The fact is that no candidate files with the party, but instead with the Secretary of State as required by the Fair Campaign Practices Act of 1988.
I will be providing full commentary to the State Democratic Executive Committee members on Saturday, which is comprised of Alabamians from all over our state's 105 State House districts. I believe the full SDEC will take a measured and practical view of this order and render a fair decision.
Should the SDEC reject this report from the sub-committee, the contest filed by Ms. Childress would fail and Ms. Todd would be the nominee in House District 54. Should the SDEC uphold the decision of the sub-committee then the SDEC would be charged with selecting a new nominee for District 54. I have previously sent a memorandum to all State Democratic Executive Committee members encouraging attendance and emphasizing the need for rational, respectful decision-making.
Good for him.
URGENT: Contact local Democratic Party leaders and urge them to help overturn this injustice. You can find numerous links here.
BaT's previous post about Patricia Todd is here.